[Reading] ➾ Writing the Book of the World Author Theodore Sider – Buyprobolan50.co.uk

Writing the Book of the World In Order To Perfectly Describe The World, It Is Not Enough To Speak Truly In This Ambitious And Ground Breaking Book, Theodore Sider Argues That For A Representation To Be Fully Successful, Truth Is Not Enough The Representation Must Also Use The Right Concepts Concepts That Carve At The Joints So That Its Conceptual Structure Matches Reality S Structure There Is An Objectively Correct Way To Write The Book Of The World Sider S Argument Begins From The Assertion That Metaphysics Is About The Fundamental Structure Of Reality Not About What S Necessarily True Not About What Properties Are Essential Not About Conceptual Analysis And Not About What There Is While Inquiry Into Necessity, Essence, Concepts, Or Ontology Might Help To Illuminate Reality S Structure, The Ultimate Goal Is Insight Into This Structure Sider Argues That Part Of The Theory Of Structure Is An Account Of How Structure Connects To Other Concepts For Example, Structure Can Be Used To Illuminate Laws Of Nature, Explanation, Reference, Induction, Physical Geometry, Substantivity, Conventionality, Objectivity, And Metametaphysics Another Part Is An Account Of How Structure Behaves Since Structure Is A Way Of Thinking About Fundamentality, Sider S Account Implies Distinctive Answers To Questions About The Nature Of Fundamentality These Answers Distinguish His Theory Of Structure From Other Recent Theories Of Fundamentality, Including Kit Fine S Theory Of Ground And Reality, The Theory Of Truthmaking, And Jonathan Schaffer S Theory Of Ontological Dependence

10 thoughts on “Writing the Book of the World

  1. says:

    In this book Sider develops a worldview whereby all substantive metaphysical questions are traced to questions concerning the fundamental structure of the universe Sider s project is ambitious, interesting, and even appealing in certain ways.It is also maddening in the way it co opts various debates in metaphysics for his own purposes It s maddening in other ways, too.

  2. says:

    This is a decent book The writing is clear and well informed I have found it a helpful jumping off point for a number of contemporary debates in Metaphysics But I also was unconvinced by many of its arguments, so I m only going to give it 3 stars.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *